Course research
Research & References
On this page
- How the course was developed
- Editorial standards
- How we choose sources
- Course design and assessment
- Pillar 1: Social Media Literacy
- Pillar 2: Digital Reputation
- Pillar 3: Personal Branding
- Professional Edition: workplace sources
- Advanced Parent Resource Guide and safety resources
- Instructional design reference
- Reviews, updates and corrections
The BrandWise Certification brings widely accepted guidance about social media into one clear, age-appropriate course. Very little of it is new or secret. Its value is in organizing what public agencies, professional bodies, researchers and the platforms themselves already say, and teaching it in a way students can use. This page lists the 44 published sources behind the course and explains how it was developed, so parents, schools and reviewers can see exactly where the content comes from.
How the course was developed
An experienced curriculum team. The course was developed by a curriculum team whose members previously designed and taught social media literacy and digital reputation courses that earned national accreditation. Those earlier courses, and what the team learned delivering them to students, schools and organizations, served as a reference point for the scope and structure of this course.
Newly written for today’s platforms. Every lesson, activity, scenario and assessment question in the BrandWise Certification was written new and checked against current platform features and current public guidance. Earlier material was used as a reference only, not copied.
Expert input. The course was shaped with input from education professionals, including a former director of education and curriculum for accredited programs, and from social media and digital marketing professionals who work with the major platforms every day.
The BrandWise Certification awards a Certificate of Completion issued by BrandWise, which anyone can verify online with its certificate ID. This page describes the course’s sources and how it was built; it is not a statement of accreditation for the BrandWise Certification.
Editorial standards
Every module follows the same rules:
- Best practices, not opinions. The course teaches widely accepted guidance and standards, not personal views.
- Non-political and non-controversial. No political examples, parties, public figures or hot-button issues, and no ranking of news outlets as good or bad.
- Balanced. The course acknowledges that social media has real benefits, and teaches students to use it well rather than fear it.
- No statistic without a source. Any number in the course is tied to a source on this page. Where survey data is older, the course uses careful wording (for example, “most hiring managers”) instead of precise percentages.
- Plain and age-appropriate. Friendly, direct language, written in the second person, without scare tactics or lecturing.
- Platform-neutral. Platforms are named only to explain how a feature works or where a setting lives, never to praise or criticize a company.
How we choose sources
Sources are chosen in this order of preference:
- Government and public agencies, such as the Federal Trade Commission, the FBI, the Department of Justice, CISA and StopBullying.gov.
- Professional bodies and national organizations, such as the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Colleges and Employers, and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.
- The platforms’ own help centers and policies, for how features, settings and recommendations actually work.
- Peer-reviewed research, used to support points that the consensus sources above already make, not to introduce new claims on the strength of a single study.
- Industry surveys and news reports, used sparingly, dated, and described cautiously.
Course design and assessment
- Three pillars. Social Media Literacy, Digital Reputation and Personal Branding (11 modules, Student Edition), or Professional Branding (12 modules, Professional Edition).
- A measurable learning objective for every module, written with action verbs that describe what a student will be able to do.
- A consistent lesson structure: a hook, a short reading, a hands-on “Try it,” a realistic scenario with a discussion answer, and quick practice questions.
- Module quizzes graded on our servers, so answers can’t be looked up in the page.
- A 25-question final assessment in which every question is mapped to a module learning objective, with an 80% passing standard. Every module quiz must also be passed before a certificate is issued.
- A verifiable certificate with a unique ID and QR code that schools and employers can check online.
- A companion Advanced Parent Resource Guide that follows the course module by module.
Pillar 1: Social Media Literacy
Modules 1.1 to 1.3: how platforms work, spotting misinformation and manipulation, healthy and intentional use
- TikTok. (2020, June 18). How TikTok recommends videos #ForYou. TikTok Newsroom.
- Mosseri, A. (2023, May 31). Instagram ranking explained. Instagram.
- YouTube. (n.d.). How YouTube recommendations work. YouTube Help.
- Associated Press. (2025, January 7). Meta says it will follow X, replace fact-checking with Community Notes. PBS NewsHour.
- Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.
- Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318.
- Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26).
- Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Fact checkers outperform historians and students in evaluating online information. Stanford News.
- Federal Trade Commission. (n.d.). Family emergency scams. FTC Consumer Advice.
- Los Angeles County Department of Consumer and Business Affairs. (2023, May 15). Scammers use AI to enhance family emergency scams.
- Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity. (n.d.). C2PA and Content Credentials explainer.
- Google. (n.d.). Search with an image on Google. Google Search Help.
- Meta. (n.d.). Inauthentic behavior. Meta Transparency Center.
- Instagram. (2024, September 17). Introducing Instagram Teen Accounts.
- Apple. (n.d.). Use Screen Time on your iPhone and iPad. Apple Support.
- Google. (n.d.). Manage how you spend time on your Android phone with Digital Wellbeing. Android Help.
- X. (n.d.). How to mute accounts on X. X Help Center.
- American Psychological Association. (2023, May 9). APA panel issues recommendations for adolescent social media use.
- American Psychological Association. (2023). Health advisory on social media use in adolescence.
- Office of the Surgeon General. (2023). Social media and youth mental health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Pillar 2: Digital Reputation
Modules 2.1 to 2.4: privacy, judgment and context, what colleges and employers look for, recovering from a mistake
- Federal Trade Commission. (2014). Net Cetera: Chatting with kids about being online.
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (n.d.). More than a password.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). What is cyberbullying. StopBullying.gov.
- Olsen, J., & McCune, A. (2016, July 25). Bystanders can help limit hurtful effects of cyberbullying. StopBullying.gov.
- U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division. (n.d.). Citizen’s guide to U.S. federal law on child pornography.
- Kaplan. (2024, January 30). Kaplan survey: College admissions officers and applicants’ social media.
- CareerBuilder. (2017, June 15). 7 in 10 employers research job candidates online.
- HR Dive. (2023, June 20). Most hiring managers check candidates’ social media (reporting a ResumeBuilder survey).
- Federal Bureau of Investigation, Columbia Field Office. (2022, April 13). FBI Columbia warns of sextortion schemes targeting young boys.
- Federal Bureau of Investigation, Newark Field Office. (2022, April 13). FBI’s Newark office warns parents of an increase in sextortion cases.
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. (n.d.). CyberTipline.
Pillar 3: Personal Branding
Modules 3.1 to 3.4: what a personal brand is, building a consistent presence, growing a real network, turning your presence into an advantage
- National Association of Colleges and Employers. (n.d.). What is career readiness?.
- Federal Trade Commission. (2024, August 14). Federal Trade Commission announces final rule banning fake reviews and testimonials.
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. (2017, July 3). Use your NetSmartz: Tips for tweens. NetSmartz.
Professional Edition: workplace sources
Additional sources used in the Professional Edition (12 modules, including 2.5 Professional Conduct & Company Policy). Sources above also apply where cited.
- Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internet Crime Complaint Center. (2023, June 9). Business email compromise: The $50 billion scam (Alert No. I-060923-PSA).
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (n.d.). Recognize and report phishing. Secure Our World.
- Federal Trade Commission. (2026, April 30). That job offer text is probably a scam. FTC Consumer Alerts.
- Federal Trade Commission. (2025, July 15). FTC’s Endorsement Guides: What people are asking. FTC Business Guidance.
- National Labor Relations Board. (n.d.). Social media.
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission & Federal Trade Commission. (n.d.). Background checks: What employers need to know.
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Harassment.
Advanced Parent Resource Guide and safety resources
Resources named in the course and the Advanced Parent Resource Guide
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. (2023, February 27). NCMEC launches new service that can help you “Take It Down”.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (n.d.). 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline fact sheet.
Instructional design reference
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Reviews, updates and corrections
Platforms change quickly. The course and this reference list are reviewed at least once a year, and sooner when a platform changes a feature the course describes. All web sources were accessed in October 2026.
See something outdated or inaccurate? Email hello@itsbrandwise.com and we’ll review it.